On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 16:19, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:38:08 +0300, Georgi Guninski said: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:14:21AM +0200, Feher Tamas wrote: > > > http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-5229707.html > > > > > > the "early stages" of building the case, Toulouse said. The company is > > > considering creating a patch quickly and releasing it as soon as > > > possible, rather than waiting for its usual monthly update. > > > > > > > hehehehe, a quick patch from m$, this is fun. > > Well... when somebody makes it publicly known that you've had your thumb > jammed up your ass for several months, you can either pull it out before > the paparazzi show up, or wait for the usual first-Tuesday thumb extraction. > > Anybody know if this one was listed on > http://www.eeye.com/html/research/upcoming/index.html > or any of the other well-known "they've known about it for N days" lists? Does anyone know of a *reputable* list of similar nature detailing how linux and other OSS perform in the discovery-patch timescale. I'm attending a seminar hosted by MS in which they are discussing the pro's and con's of commercial software and OSS, I'd like to carry a heavy ammunition belt into the fight and I know this will be an element focused upon. -- Barrie Dempster [ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ] <spam type="places I think you should go"> Do something good http://www.lp2p.org Open Source Vulnerability Database http://www.osvdb.org </spam>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part