[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS web designers -- "What Security Initiative?"
- To: Nick FitzGerald <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS web designers -- "What Security Initiative?"
- From: David Maxwell <david@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 07:11:14 -0400
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
> The MS Security Initiative is an utter sham.
Good comments about continued web-cluelessness omitted.
> At the outset of the Security Initiative the skeptics largely said
> "it's a marketing ploy", but its defenders said "it will take time for
> the real results to be seen". As the weeks turned into months and now
> years and little has been seen to have improved (and some very public
> things to have gone backwards), it seems increasingly that the skeptics
> may have been right...
For years, Microsoft has had a policy of announcing products that don't
exist yet, to cause customers to stop buying a competitor's product.
That's Vapourware.
Is it really any shock that they would want to prevent customers from
using more robust OSs and tools, by offering Vapoursecurity?
--
David Maxwell, david@xxxxxxx|david@xxxxxxxxxxx -->
Any sufficiently advanced Common Sense will seem like magic...
- me
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html