Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Bypassing "smart" IDSes with misdirected frames? (long and boring)

[Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Jim Bauer wrote:

> The IDS will see not see a valid response to the "DATA" command (that is
> never received) so it will know it is still in SMTP command mode.  Even
> if your not-so-smart IDS let this slip by, there is still the issue of
> "DEBUG" not being in a valid format for a header.

Which is precisely what I stated in the next paragraph. This is a naive
example, but illustrates w far broader and non-SMTP-specific problem quite
well. There are various protocols or attack vectors that do not involve
challenge-response communications (even the problem of distinguishing
between message body and message headers can be an example).

Cheers,
-- 
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
 Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
    Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2004-05-28 18:19 --

   http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html