RE: [Full-Disclosure] Vendor casual towards vulnerability found in product

["Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh]" <aditya.deshmukh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> 1. Would an exploit like this be said to be severe?  

yes i assume from your email that the url would have to recofig the server from 
the scratch then not serious but if any file can be deleted then it is serious 

> 2. Is the vendor right in their approach to this issue?

no, the vendor should release a full advisory about this and at a minimum 
release the patch for this 

> 3. How do I make public the vulnerability? (Vendor has given 
> permission for
> the same) 

google around the rain forest puppy's disclosure policy for this, it is really 
good for this 

> 4. Ok, I'll rather ask... *should* I make public details of this
> vulnerability? (Since I know of sites using this app server, and 
> they may be
> taken down if the exploit goes out)
> 

don't make it public without giving all the people affected a chance to protect 
their system, however you may release something like a one line description of 
this and *not* give details to anyone except the vendor 


-aditya


________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html