Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco's stolen code

[Harlan Carvey <keydet89@xxxxxxxxx>]

m5x,

As with most public forums, you've missed the point...

--- madsaxon <madsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 10:45 AM 5/25/2004 -0700, Harlan Carvey wrote:
> 
> >Valdis,
> >
> >I sincerely hope that you do not presume to speak
> for
> >everyone...
> 
> He's not offering an opinion, merely stating a fact:
> if whitehats are security researchers who don't
> break the law, then they don't audit code the
> possession of which is illegal.  The only
> debatable point here is the definition of
> "whitehat,"
> but that's really just a matter of semantics.
> This code is the proprietary property of Cisco.
> Anyone who knowingly examines it or even possesses
> it without Cisco's permission is in violation of
> the law in most countries, and therefore not,
> by definition, acting as a "whitehat."
> 
> m5x
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html