Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco's stolen code

[Harlan Carvey <keydet89@xxxxxxxxx>]

Valdis,

I sincerely hope that you do not presume to speak for
everyone...


--- Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:28:19 EDT, Brian Toovey
> <btoovey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  said:
> 
> > if whitehats dont audit the code, who will?  I
> find your response more
> > ignorant.
> 
> Whitehats won't go anywhere near the Cisco code for
> the same reason they won't
> go near the Windows code - even if they feel morally
> justified in peeking at
> the source code, it's still illegal to do so.  So
> you need at least a slightly
> gray hat to even consider the idea - so only
> grey/black hats will benefit.
> 
> #include
>
<open-source-is-better-because-whitehats-can-audit-too.h>
> 
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature 


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html