[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Calcuating Loss
- To: Full-Disclosure <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Calcuating Loss
- From: Harlan Carvey <keydet89@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 08:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Clint...
Two words..."testing process". What happened to that?
Don't tell me you're installing patches directly to
production systems...
--- Clint Bodungen <clint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How about when Micro$oft releases a bundled patch
> (cough cough MS04-011) to
> fix several bugs and security holes (supposedly to
> help "minimize loss" from
> these bugs and worms) only to find out that the
> patch itself has broken just
> as many services as it fixed, taking down one's
> server for a few hours,
> causing yet... more loss! ;-)
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > Loss?
> >
> > One of my biggest complaints is the way the
> industry "loses billions"
> > whenever a virus or worm breaks out.
> >
> > I mean, securing and maintain your server is not a
> loss. Installing and
> > updating your anti virus or IDS package is not a
> loss. All of these
> > things should have been done anyway.
> >
> > If a server goes off line, I guess you could
> measure the revenue it may
> > have produced as a loss, but technically, that is
> lack of income, not
> > true loss.
> >
> > If you see someone complaining about all the money
> they lost doing what
> > they should have been doing all along, I just see
> spin. And politics.
> >
> > M
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html