[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Learn from history?
- To: Alerta Redsegura <alerta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Learn from history?
- From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:50:16 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Alerta Redsegura wrote:
> When we talk about risk, we are already taking into account the odds of the
> event happening:
>
> R = E x p
>
> Where:
>
> R = Risk
> E = event
> p = probability of the event happening
If we must toy with bogus marketspeak "equations", shouldn't E - at the
very least - numerically correspond to the consequences (loss?) caused by
an event, rather than being an event itself?
Otherwise, my risk R of getting a bar of chocolate from a stranger is
0.001 * getting_chocolate_bar_from_stranger.
--
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2004-05-10 16:47 --
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html