RE: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat

["Jos Osborne" <Jos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

So what you're saying is more like Quality Control than censorship yes?

Jos


-----Original Message-----
From: madsaxon [mailto:madsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 May 2004 16:27
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat


At 04:37 PM 5/4/2004 +0200, Christian Fromme wrote:

>Censorship is not what we're looking for.

I think that's a debatable issue.  It seems to me that
some people on this list confuse "full disclosure of
exploit-related code and advisories" with "unfettered
posting of any shit that comes into a 14 year old's head
at the moment."  This list would be far more productive
if we weren't constantly subjected to this barrage of
pointless flaming and adolescent taunting.  I trust at
least one person will reply to this with something that
illustrates my point.

m5x

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html