[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] THCIISSLame exploit
- To: Feher Tamas <etomcat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] THCIISSLame exploit
- From: Sebastian Krahmer <krahmer@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:22:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Feher Tamas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >THC is a hacker group, not a cracker group.
>
> Publishing root exploit source code is free speech and is protected.
>
> Publishing the binary is VX-ing and is criminal. That is very clear.
Wheres the V in "exploit"? Its maybe EXing...
>
> BTW, AV software only alert on binaries. AV firm research labs refuse to
> investigate malware in source code format, even if you send them a
> sample of a brand new one.
>
> To share knowledge with security researchers does not require
> releasing binary executables, professional testers can compile the
> source code for themselves. Avoid releasing binaries and you will not
I doubt that. At least it probably doesnt apply to 100%. What for is
impact?
regards,
Sebastian
--
~
~ perl self.pl
~ $_='print"\$_=\47$_\47;eval"';eval
~ krahmer@xxxxxxx - SuSE Security Team
~
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html