[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [FD] FD should block attachments
- To: "Luke Norman" <luke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [FD] FD should block attachments
- From: "Mike Smith" <mike@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 19:36:50 -0400
>
>>am i missing something here?
>> because i realy do not see the issue.
>>
>
>Yes, you are
>As far as I can see from the numerous postings on the list, the issue
>isn't really recieving virii or anything else, it's the wasted
>time/bandwidth etc etc that comes from attatchments, and the costs that
>places on users who pay by the minute or by the megabyte. I personally
>don't think attatchments should be stopped, but I believe that's the
>argument for their filtering?
>Luke
Having followed this list for the previous year, I can not say
that any and all possible attachments waste any more time than some of
the conversations that take place. It gets ridiculous... For me, it's
down to about 1 of every 10 threads and 1 of every 25 posts that holds
any interest of useful information... Those are approaching my unusable
limits....
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html