Re: [Full-Disclosure] FD should block attachments

[petard <petard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 09:41:01AM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Friday, April 02, 2004 01:16:24 AM -0500 Poof <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
> >Yeah... I've got Dialup and don't see a problem with the attachments.
> >
> >Heck. Emailing it to everybody rather than hosting the file(s) is better
> >for me as I dislike hosting files on my own webspace.
> >
> How considerate of you.
> 
> Did you ever consider that people in some parts of the world pay by the 
> byte or by the time they're online, and attachments, especially large ones 
> *and* html email cost them money personally?

and they'd do well to sign up for kurt's edited version... all the
security, none of the crap:
http://lists.seifried.org/mailman/listinfo/security

hth,

petard

--
If your message really might be confidential, download my PGP key here:
http://petard.freeshell.org/petard.asc
and encrypt it. Otherwise, save bandwidth and lose the disclaimer.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html