Re: [Full-Disclosure] FD should block attachments

[Niek Baakman <niekbaakman@xxxxxxx>]

Paul Schmehl wrote:

> --On Friday, April 02, 2004 01:16:24 AM -0500 Poof 
> <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Yeah... I've got Dialup and don't see a problem with the attachments.
> >
> > Heck. Emailing it to everybody rather than hosting the file(s) is better
> > for me as I dislike hosting files on my own webspace.
> How considerate of you.
>
> Did you ever consider that people in some parts of the world pay by the 
> byte or by the time they're online, and attachments, especially large 
> ones *and* html email cost them money personally?
>
> Not everyone in the world has the choices that some people assume are 
> universally available.

They have the choice not to sign up, and read the FD archives instead.
If you can't deal with the noise/virii/ect/ect that comes with an
unmoderated list, unsubscribe right now!

--

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't 
exist.
PGP KeyID: 0x65C28B9A   |    Fingerprint: 
7A5301026E58CF3FACE7F2F0D82B854565C28B9A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature