RE: [Full-Disclosure] Signal to Noise Ratio for February

["Epic" <epic@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Lately the SNR wouldn't allow for minimal communications if this were
any communications infrastructure.



-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of flatline
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 4:45 PM
To: Gregory A. Gilliss; full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Signal to Noise Ratio for February

Gregory,

What makes you think F-D's "signal" would consist solely of advisories?
If 
you've read the list charter 
(http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html), you should know
to 
not only filter on the word "advisory".

Your method of generating a signal:noise relation seems far from
correct.

/ flatline

At 11:41 PM 24-03-2004, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
>List:
>
>Just for fun I decided to calculate the S/N ratio of FD. I used the
>data from February 2004 (the last full month available). Here's my
>methodology (for those who can do better :-):

[ snip ]  

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html