[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: pgp passphrase
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: pgp passphrase
- From: Michael Cecil <macecil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:00:46 -0600
At 03:21 PM 3/22/2004, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx said:
>On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:58:23 +0100, Nico Golde <nion@xxxxxxx> said:
>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ password
>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ password
>
>> > Can you spot both passphrases?
>>
>> i think i am right.
>
>Right. You've proven that a *human* looking at the datastream can probably
>guess the passphrases. The challenge was to write software that can do a
>passable
>job of it. Hmm.. that's almost an inverse of the Turing Test... ;)
Why would it need to guess? It could simply try every logged string ending
in a crlf. I doubt that overhead would even be noticeable to the victim.
--
Michael Cecil
macecil@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://home.comcast.net/~macecil/howto/
http://home.comcast.net/~antiviruscd/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html