Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed)

[Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 11:41:46 -0500,
  Cael Abal <lists2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> "Dan's proposal is intrinsically flawed. It incorrectly assumes that the
> sender can reasonably anticipate the recipient's needs in replying to
> the message, and that such needs can reasonably be lumped into either
> "reply" or "followup". It doesn't solve the real problem, which is that
> responders need to think about where their replies go. Mail-Followup-To
> won't decrease the number of messages that go to the wrong place."

But you can at least tell people if you want or need a separate copy
in addition to what gets sent to the list. People who don't want separate
copies should be setting mail-followup-to. Even if not all mail clients
support it some do.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html