Re: Administrivia (was: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? )

[Nick FitzGerald <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

madsaxon <madsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote?

> >Also, when sending messages to multiple lists (say F-D and Bugtraq), it
> >seems you may slightly reduce the multiple message spew that often
> >results on F-D because of the above by putting all the addresses in the
> >To: header, rather than one in the To: and the other(s) in CC:.
> 
> Why is that, do you think?

Because, from a rather cursory look at several such multiple mails, 
_some_ of those braindead "I'll forward it to every address I can find 
in the message headers even though it did not originate on-site" re-
posters only seem to do this with messages that have CC: headers.


Regards,

Nick FitzGerald

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html