[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
- To: "Simon Richter" <Simon.Richter@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Geoincidents" <geoincidents@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
- From: "Geo." <geoincidents@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:12:24 -0500
>>Hrm, how about inventing an option (at install time) that places a very
restrictive firewall on the network connection by default, say, only
outgoing port 80 to windowsupdate.com (or even better, only let it
establish a secure tunnel there), so you can patch and then loosen the
firewall settings after that?<<
It doesn't address the issue. The requirement is that some MS customers need
to patch without putting the machine on the internet. For whatever reasons.
Is that such an unreasonable request?
Geo.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html