[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
- To: "'Geoincidents'" <geoincidents@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
- From: "Curt Purdy" <purdy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:28:48 -0600
Geoincidents wrote:
> to secure 2000 without using the network and windowsupdate:
>
> install 2000
> sp4
> Windows2000-KB823559-x86-ENU.exe
<unbelievably big snip>
> Q832894.exe
>
> NT4 is even worse and before they are allowed to completely
> drop support for
> NT4 they should at least have the decency to do a rollup of
> all the patches
> so it's left in some sort of workable condition for those who aren't
> upgrading.
But that would be opposed to their busines model that is based on doing
their best to force you to upgrade, as opposed to creating and supporting a
good product. Personally, W2K was my last MS product.
BTW, I love the way SuSe updates online during install, before the first
boot off the hard drive. Those guys know security.
Curt Purdy CISSP, GSEC, MCSE+I, CNE, CCDA
Information Security Engineer
DP Solutions
----------------------------------------
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html