[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Comcast using IPS to protect the Internetfrom their home user clients?
- To: "Matthew C. Beckman" <fulldisclosure@xxxxxxxx>, "Luke Scharf" <lscharf@xxxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Comcast using IPS to protect the Internetfrom their home user clients?
- From: "Exibar" <exibar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:44:14 -0500
BINGO! You've hit the ISP's nail right on the head.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew C. Beckman" <fulldisclosure@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Luke Scharf" <lscharf@xxxxxxxxxx>; <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Comcast using IPS to protect the Internetfrom
their home user clients?
> > But, if those terms aren't acceptable, then why sign up for the
> > service in the first place?
>
> I think the objection is simply that Comcast won't define the terms.
> As someone else mentioned, there are a lot of reports of Comcast
> cutting off service to someone with the reason being, that they
> over-used the service. If they are advertising unlimited internet
> service first off, and then won't define what 'too much' bandwidth
> usage is, that is where the problem comes in. Even those people that
> have been cut off have been unable to find out where that line is
> drawn.
>
> If they would be more clear in their policies, I don't think anyone
> would have room to complain.
>
> - Matthew C. Beckman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html