On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 01:01, m.mohr@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > The problem with that is that there is no incrementing counter. The > output never gets written to file, since nc sends data directly to stdout. > Which is why I had an 'x' variable in my loop - it conveniently increments > by one each iteration, thus generating a new filename. Of course. My point was just that calling nc in a loop has the same effect as the -L option. No need for patching and recompiling. I didn't even see your line until just now. Looks like I just stated the obvious... sorry. Your code is right on. Cheers, Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part