[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows
- To: Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows
- From: Daniel <deadbeat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:15:47 +0000 (UTC)
sooooooooooo close, i reckon you shuold get some that prize fund for
finding it though ;)
regards,
deadbeat
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> [joro@sivokote tmp]$ ./qma-qmtpd.pl
> qmail-qmtpd buffer overflow. Copyright Georgi Guninski
> Cannot be used in vulnerability databases and similar stuff
>
> <in another terminal>
> ps awx
> 2080 pts/9 S 0:00 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qmtpd
> gdb attach 2080
> cont
> <in first terminal hit enter>
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0804b096 in alarm ()
> --------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html