[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [OT] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Knocking Microsoft
- To: "'Tim'" <tim-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Paul Schmehl'" <pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Knocking Microsoft
- From: Steve Wray <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:21:05 +1300
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim
> Sent: Monday, 1 March 2004 18:33
>
> > First of all, why would you do this? Secondly, it won't work
because the
> > port will simply tell you that it's already installed and suggest
you
> > uninstall the previous version first.
>
> Well, it didn't used to. And if you HAVE to uninstall the old port
> before compiling the new one... isn't that already broken? How long
> does it take to compile Apache? You want your servers down that long?
> Once again, I am going on old information, but back then, it was
> rediculous how short-sighted some of the ports scripts were.
I hate to butt into this thread but compiling apache on your primary web
server,
even having a compiler on an internet exposed machine, is just plain
daft.
Surely this OS (FreeBSD, IIRC) wouldn't require such lunacy?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html