[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] a question about e-mails
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] a question about e-mails
- From: Nico Golde <nion@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:48:12 +0100
Hello Gary,
* Gary E. Miller <gem@xxxxxxxxxx> [2004-02-28 20:19]:
> > > Sounds like a broken MTA to me.
> >
> > why?
> > regards nico
>
> RFC 2822 Appendix B.1:
>
> 1. Each recipient address from a TO, CC, or BCC header field SHOULD
> be copied to a RCPT command (generating multiple message copies if
> that is required for queuing or delivery). This includes any
> addresses listed in a RFC 822 "group". Any BCC fields SHOULD then
> be removed from the headers. Once this process is completed, the
> remaining headers SHOULD be checked to verify that at least one
> To:, Cc:, or Bcc: header remains. If none do, then a bcc: header
> with no additional information SHOULD be inserted as specified in
> [32].
ok, then the problem depends on the configuration of the mta and i will
fix it in my configuration.
sorry.
regards nico
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html