[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Knocking Microsoft
- To: "'martin f krafft'" <madduck@xxxxxxxxxxx>, full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Knocking Microsoft
- From: Steve Wray <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 08:31:57 +1300
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> martin f krafft
> > Some of them (debian comes to mind) even set up services
> > like mysql to run in *single*user*mode*;
>
> not true.
I've seen it. I trust the evidence of my senses. It was an older debian
install though.
> > debian even brings up networking in single user!
>
> ... which is helpful. alas, there are no daemons listening, so what
> gives?
The purpose of single user is to be able to bring a machine up
in a bare state; 'single user' mode. Its just personal, but networking
is a sufficiently complex subsystem that it should not be enabled
in single user mode.
> > I recently had the joy of discovering that when you install the
> > debian watchdog package, it sets it up to run in single user, so
> > if its misconfigured, you have to boot with init=/bin/sh to fix
> > the mess (otherwise you bring it up in single user and it just
> > reboots itself over and over).
>
> wrong:
no its something I have seen happen and it wasn't pretty.
> > This isn't just a bug, its a design flaw!
>
> I'd appreciate if you'd either start using your brain or shut up
> while spouting fud!
Thats pretty rude of you, and pointless too.
Did it make you feel better though?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html