Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: [Full-Disclosure] OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME)

[Troy Solo <solo@xxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In my opinion, it would be too easy to create false "Webs of Trust"
through something like Orkut.  I personally have people on my friends
list that I've never actually met in person.

/**************************/
/*       Troy Solo        */
/*     <solo@xxxxxxx>     */
/*  Ignotum per Ignotius  */
/**************************/



Harry Hoffman wrote:
| That brings up an interesting question. Does anyone out there think
that PGP
| "web of trusts" would be easier if encorporated into something like
"Orkut" or
| "Friendster"?
|
| Obviously, those types of sites would need to evolve (change) it order
to more
| easily facilitate a trust but it could possibly be doable.
|
| Just a thought,
| Harry
|
| Quoting Kurt Seifried <listuser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
|
| *>
| *> This thread is dead. It was dead when it was started. It was dead 3
years
| *> ago.
| *>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAQCOCmaXTPtvAkS0RAvKbAKCILDCAUry8AqfU5iU5mAEl03p/tgCdEVEz
WUPqGsAAYs5roBFq1nfr0i8=
=cGqG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html