[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-Disclosure] Is a precise spec better?
- To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>, <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
- Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Is a precise spec better?
- From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards@hq.adiscon.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:43:19 +0100
Hi lists,
I am seeking some advise. I am currently writing a what-is-to-become RFC
on the syslog protocol (http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/protocol.html). My
work is currently in draft status, which essentially means it can be
used for discussion but nothing is really fixed yet.
I have written quite precise guidelines on what a syslog implementation
should do. There are good arguments that this is too precise. I am now
trying to get more feedback on the overall design decision. As such, I
have summarized things on a web page:
http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/why-indepth.html
I would appreciate all comments on this topic. As I am posting to
security lists, I would especially welcome a discussion if a precise
specification can eventually safe us some security trouble - and if the
effort is worth it.
Many thanks,
Rainer
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html