[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft confirms source code leak
- To: cta@hcsin.net
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft confirms source code leak
- From: Cael Abal <lists2@onryou.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:20:14 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
| This may be true where WIN OS based box is deployed in a
| commercial environment. However, I think their EULA is trumped
| by the new US Federal Regulations (HIPAA, DHS, CFR, etc)...
This definitely should be the case, but we'll see.
Personally, I'm amazed that EULAs / click-through licences have any
force of law whatsoever.
It's off-topic for the list, but here's a well-written article on EULAs
by Jim Rapoza. His paper hits on most of the major points and serves as
a good fairly primer for Aunt Betty.
http://www.eweek.com/print_article/0,3048,a=111018,00.asp
C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFALT+OR2vQ2HfQHfsRAo8jAJ9wafjYzhnjKprBhUm34onUT6E/0wCfYEmc
Waxg5ARDXjx+6mj6tJgdZzA=
=3J8s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html