Re: [Full-Disclosure] W2K source "leaked"?

[cameronmcansh@iprimus.com.au]

Confirmation yes. But not when the date reads Friday, 27 October, 2000, 16:23
GMT 17:23 UK 
>-- Original Message --
>Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] W2K source "leaked"?
>From: Byron Copeland <nodialtone@comcast.net>
>To: "Gregory A. Gilliss" <ggilliss@netpublishing.com>
>Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
>Date: 12 Feb 2004 20:16:03 -0500
>
>
>As an avid FULL DISCLOSURE reader, where is this "some of" source code?
>
>On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 18:55, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
>> Does this count as confirmation?
>> 
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/993933.stm
>> 
>> G
>> 
>> On or about 2004.02.12 23:48:52 +0000, Gadi Evron 
>> (ge@egotistical.reprehensible.net)
>said:
>> 
>> > A couple of days ago a friend of mine drew my attention to the source
>
>> > making rounds on the encrypted p2p networks, I was hoping it would take
>
>> > a bit longer for it to be "out", but that was just day-dreaming.
>> > 
>> > Thor Larholm just gave me this URL, as you can notice, the server is
>busy:
>> > http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=17509
>> > 
>> <<SNIP>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html