[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))
- To: <freouwebbe@msn.com>, <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))
- From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@utdallas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:27:10 -0600
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of
> roberta bragg
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:06 AM
> To: 1@malware.com; full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Cc: keith.ward@mcpmag.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Security Watch Essay (was: (no
> subject))
>
>
> Well, lets see. What gets published in any publication is
> usually an editorial decision. As in senior editor, or
> managing editor. Then again, they have to have something to
> choose from. If no one writes anything, then the editors
> have to scramble. No telling what they'll do. No telling what
> they'll publish.
Roberta, I'm not sure why you feel it necessary to defend yourself here.
This list is populated with malcontents, misfits and MS-haters (as well
as some really smart people) and, in general, it's a waste of time
trying to defend yourself. Just state your opinion and then move on.
I doubt you'll get any takers for your article, because I haven't seen
any MS-haters that have any reasoned opinions to express. They mostly
want to spew vitriol, and this list gives them that outlet because it's
unmoderated.
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html