[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))
- To: "'Cael Abal'" <lists2@onryou.com>, <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))
- From: "roberta bragg" <freouwebbe@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:20:34 -0600
MCP is not a Microsoft owned publication.
If someone wishes to write an essay it will be published on Monday in
Security Watch, a newsletter provided by the same parent company as MCP
Magazine --- 101 Communications. They have a JAVA publication, a couple for
the Feds, some for education market. In short a bunch of IT related
publications. http://www.101communications.com/
I will respond on Wednesday.
Not for Microsoft. I am not an employee of Microsoft.
Nor am I an employee of MCP magazine nor of 101 communications.
I will respond to what the writer on Monday says.
If I agree,,, I'll champion their point.
If I don't I'll argue against it.
But it will be my opinion.
Just as the author of Monday's essay will give their opinion.
I rather suspect that I'll agree with some things and disagree with others.
But I can't do either, if no one writes. And I repeat, if someone writes,,
it'll get published.
Again, here is your opportunity to express your opinion in a forum that is
different from this one. I've read a lot in here that I think others should
hear. Some I agree with and some I don't, but it should be heard. It should
be available elsewhere. Here's an opportunity to do that.
If you believe that Security Watch is a pro-Microsoft publication -- then
here's your opportunity to publish something anti-Microsoft in a pro-
Microsoft publication.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html