[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Apparently the practice was prevalent
- To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Apparently the practice was prevalent
- From: Martin Mačok <martin.macok@underground.cz>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:00:32 +0100
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 01:50:22PM -0000, John.Airey@rnib.org.uk wrote:
> RFC 821 and 822 were inadequate even before April 2001.
You told that *anyone who does not have an "open" email relay is in
breach of this RFC*. I'm asking you to prove it.
RFC 821 SIMPLE MAIL TRANSFER PROTOCOL August 1982
3.6. RELAYING
[..]
... The receiver-SMTP may accept or reject the
task of relaying the mail in the same way it accepts or rejects
mail for a local user.
[..]
Just tell me *where exactly* RFC 821 enforces receiver-SMTP to accept
and deliver every message. Which part of this RFC is receiver-SMTP
breaching when it rejects to "open relay" some message?
Martin Mačok
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html