[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] correct names [was: 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover?]


On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:59 PM, Nick FitzGerald wrote: 

Yes -- Deadhat (more correctly known as Vesser) was found late Friday
or early Saturday (depending on your TZ) but this new one, DoomJuice,
(incorrectly originally classified as a Mydoom variant and thus called
Mydoom.C by some) has only been isolated and analysed in the last few
hours...


--
Nick FitzGerald
Computer Virus Consulting Ltd.
Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854



Greetings,

Deadhat/Vesser, DoomJuice/Mydoom.c, "more correctly known as", "incorrectly originally classified as", ...

Is there, or will there ever be any kind of "naming authority" for these things? I assume that most major av houses have telephones & email access, so why isn't there any kind of agreement on names? The lack of a single name for a threat is kind of bogus.

Is this driven only by the marketing departments at the firms?

And how does the poor, long-suffering sysadmin know what the correct name is, google them all when the dust settles and see what gets the most hits??

--dj

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html