[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [Full-Disclosure] file_exists() bypassing , critical problem ?
- To: "Nourredine Himeur" <nourredine.himeur@assephira.com>, <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>, <m.esco@wp.pl>
- Subject: Re: Re: [Full-Disclosure] file_exists() bypassing , critical problem ?
- From: "VeNoMouS" <venom@gen-x.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:30:38 +1300
how is this even RELATED to full-disclosure??? man u might as well talk bout
the sco and microsoft dos, its going along the same dribble.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nourredine Himeur" <nourredine.himeur@assephira.com>
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>; <m.esco@wp.pl>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Full-Disclosure] file_exists() bypassing , critical
problem ?
> > There are various methods for securing file_exists() ...
> If you want to secure ... so that's unsecure , is'nt it ?
>
> >I don't think that is critical problem.
> If it's not a problem Why you show us a methode to secure ?
>
> I think many programmers don't know this problem exists !
> But there is too much hypocresy in php community to admit this
> vulnerability.
>
> The article : http://www.zend.com/zend/art/art-oertli.php
> don't talk about this sorry...
>
> Nourredine Himeur
>
> www.security-challenge.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html