> I never analyzed the MyDoom.A or the MyDoom.B worms because I know the
> anti-virus companies already did that the very same day they got the
virus.
> But from what I've read, the email sent by MyDoom.B is exactly the same
one
> sent by MyDoom.A. No wonder MyDoom.B never succeeded in infecting more
> machines. Even if someone on this list mistakenly got infected by the
copy
> and sent out the virus to other people it's not going to make it any
more
> successful than it is because it looks exactly like MyDoom.A in your
inbox.
And what made Mydoom.A _so_ successful?
There is always an element of what, for a better term, the experts
refer to as "luck". Technically identical mass mailers suceed and fail
more or less randomly (of course, you don't see the hoards of entirely
uncessful ones we do, so you wouldn't know this. Mydoom.B has more
chance of striking it lucky the more people run it, simply because of