[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] sco.com -> slow? :)
- To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] sco.com -> slow? :)
- From: "Bojan Zdrnja" <Bojan.Zdrnja@LSS.hr>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:01:58 +1300
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of
> Gary E. Miller
> Sent: Monday, 2 February 2004 8:43 a.m.
> To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: Re:[Full-Disclosure] sco.com -> slow? :)
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yo All!
>
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Thomas Zangl - Mobil wrote:
>
> > Their headline is very true:
> > MyDoom vs SCO = 1:0
>
> No one has mentioned yet that www.microsoft.com has gone
> "lite". There
> usual graphics heavy page is now almost all text. All the better to
> withstand a "GET storm". So I propose at the end of the 1st quarter:
Hmm, Microsoft's Web page looks all the same to me.
Besides that, I see no reason why Microsoft should do anything about MyDoom.
Only variant B tries to perform a DDoS against Microsoft's web site and that
variant didn't spread a lot (if at all - I didn't receive a single infected
message with MyDoom-B on a server which catches 60.000 MyDoom-A per day).
Bojan
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html