[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] antivirus s/w
- To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] antivirus s/w
- From: Damian Gerow <damian@sentex.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:03:59 -0500
Thus spake Bryan K. Watson (bwatson@nettracers.com) [27/01/04 15:57]:
> >Especially with virii spoofing the "From" field now. It just ends up with
> >somebody at random getting the response, which is likely to cause more
> >confusion.
>
> The problem is not just antivirus software...the SMTP RFC states that mail
> servers must be polite as well....so all the sysadmins have to deal with
> purging all those double bounces from faked headers and invalid
> destinations.
~postmaster/.procmailrc:
:0:
* ^Subject: (Postmaster (notify|warning)|Could not send message
for|Returned mail)
double-bounce
(Note that this will need to change if you send mail from postmaster@.)
Not terribly difficult. IMHO, dealing with false virus notifications -- and
servers that 'politely' strip the worm code before it gets to you -- is a
bigger pain. I actually get more 'disinfected' viruses than viruses
themselves. Until we see a virus that attaches itself to valid messages
(which I bet will be Real Soon Now), there's no need to just disinfect an
e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html