[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Reverse http traffic revisited
- To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Reverse http traffic revisited
- From: George Adamopoulos <zen32689@zen.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:40:31 +0000
On 18 Jan 2004 01:12:17 -0800
"Daniel H. Renner" <dan@losangelescomputerhelp.com> wrote:
> ICMP PING CyberKit 2.2 Windows
This is how snort detects blaster's/nachi's attempts to ping an IP in order to
check if it's alive, before trying to connect to port 80. Could be another
variation of the blaster worm.I would check (Also snort may detect Cyberkit's
2.2 packets as well, but i suppose that is something you would know of). If the
packets are incoming, it is a normal thing that i witness in snort's logs as
well very often. Actually, i have removed the rule from snort's rulesets,
because it used to fill my logs with cyberkit attempts :P. If it is outgoing
traffic, i would suggest that you should run trend's housecall (free online
antivirus) on the windows servers/workstations of your network.
Also... gateway.dll is because of msn chat. If you add a deny acl for
gateway.dll in your squid.conf, your workstations won't be able to use msn chat
any more.
Giorgos Adamopoulos
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html