[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day)
- To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day)
- From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@utdallas.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:51:27 -0600
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik van Straten [mailto:emvs.fd.3FB4D11C@cpo.tn.tudelft.nl]
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 10:39 AM
> To: Schmehl, Paul L
> Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Flawed arguments (Was all that
> other crap about PFW day)
>
> *I* [1] complained that PFW's fool people into thinking that
> they are more secure - an idea you reject *AND* support in
> the same post [2] clearly shown in [3]
>
Well, you've certainly master the art of entirely missing the point.
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html