[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Professional Groups
- To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Professional Groups
- From: Ka <ka@khidr.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:54:34 +0100
At Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 19:06 James.Cupps@sappi.com wrote:
> All of the arguments for unionizing have centered around job security and
> control of direction in the company to make life better.
No, not all, mine for example not.
> Now I have to ask what does any of this do with Info Security let alone
> vulnerability exposure?
The IT security specialist being "owned" socially
has nothing to do with security? I must be dreaming.
That whole discussion about off-topic and what should
be allowed to discuss in this list is not proof enough?
The scissors are already installed in our heads.
-- snip --
Ka
--
r00ted systems tend to get patched so that no other can
come in, apparently they are invulnerable -- afterwards.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html