[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT: http://rss.com.com/2100-1002-5076903.html?tag=nl
- To: Ka <ka@khidr.net>, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT: http://rss.com.com/2100-1002-5076903.html?tag=nl
- From: George Capehart <capegeo@opengroup.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:37:32 -0500
On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:15 pm, Ka wrote:
<snip>
>
> OK, my serious answer -- I hope the straight way of expressing myself
> is not taken personally.
Not at all. I appreciate straight talk.
>
>
> I think "they" got "it" quite well.
>
>
> It's just a question, what this "it" is for you.
> MS plays for market share and public opinion and influence to
> politicians. And MS does that quite well. While the IT professionals
> have not managed to create a professional association in 35 years.
>
> If "we" (IT professionals) had a world wide organisation with as many
> members (percent-wise) as MS has world wide market share,
> there would be no need to nag about Balmers statements.
You are absolutely right.
>
> > Sorry. That just insulted even my limited intelligence . . .
>
> Everybody has his limits. It just depends for what you use your
> resources.
>
> It's time we as a professional group start talking and walking like
> adults (at least more than in the past), I think. Just playing with
> computers is fine, but not enough.
Agreed. And believe me, I have spent many an hour trying to figure out
how to approach the problem. Unfortunately, every solution I can come
up with involves educating the masses . . . many of whom don't want to
be confused with facts . . . ;>
/g
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html