On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:13:26 GMT, John.Airey@rnib.org.uk said: > Guys, this is getting to be a peeing contest. Can anyone confirm that the > gcc maintainers are aware of this, and are they able to make a statement as > to which compilers need their optimisation code sorted? Don't even bother. 2.95 was dead a long time ago, and the gcc maintainers will just say "It's fixed in 3.X, why you bothering to tell us about old bugs?".
Attachment:
pgp00016.pgp
Description: PGP signature