[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!



Richard Maudsley wrote:
I recently finished a stable version of my little Virus-Scanner, LMS ( http://www.mindblock.org/lms ).
It currently detects 19 viruses. I need it to detect hundreds.


How do big Anti-Virus companies get their hands on new viruses, and how can I?

Antivirus software is one of the biggest frauds going in the software industry. You really don't want to go there. Consider something useful instead:


(from http://www.windevnet.com)

Antivirus Software Turned Upside Down
by Jason Coombs (jasonc@science.org)

Antivirus software exists because viral code and malware exist. Malware signature databases coupled with antivirus software provide what I'll call "matter of fact, after the fact" security. It is a matter of fact that bytes matching an a/v vendor's malware signature must have malicious potential resembling a known virus, worm, Trojan, or other code analyzed in the past by the a/v software vendor and labeled as harmful. While false positives do occur in practice, a virus scanner wouldn't be useful if it constantly failed to distinguish between malware and user data or desireable code. Therefore, a/v software becomes the best proof, in practice, that particular bits are hostile. No jury is likely to reject forensic testimony designed to establish the presence of malware after seeing a forensic examiner employ a trusted brand-name a/v scanner to detect a virus or Trojan on a hard drive or other storage device. A commercial virus scanner makes a terrific exhibit in front of a jury. As a result, there is a distinct possibility that civilian security researchers may help to convict hackers (and other civilian security researchers) of computer crimes simply by adding definitions to a virus signature database. Law enforcement simply lack the resources necessary to assemble definitive lists of criminally-malicious bits, so we end up with an interesting, and uncomfortable, overlap between private sector business decisions and law enforcement investigations.

Antivirus software vendors make no effort to conceal the fact that they are in the business of selling virus signature updates. They sell content more than software, and it is content updates that drive their profits. Updates to virus definitions occur after the fact, so everyone is always out-of-date and must keep paying in order to feel protected. This makes for a good business, but it doesn't make for very good security. In fact, it's completely backwards. Think about it for a moment, why should anyone go through the expense and the trouble of keeping a running list of all bad code ever encountered? We can prove that something is good just as easily as we can prove that something is bad, but publishing a list of all known good software wouldn't be very profitable. Few people would ever have a need for the entire database. Most people would have no need for updates unless they planned to install more software. Restricting the execution of code by a CPU to a small list of known good programs that the owner of the computer chooses to trust would basically kill the antivirus industry. Such a deny-first security policy would give computer owners the kind of control over their boxes that the introduction of automobile ignition keys gave to early motorists. The fact is that today's computers are still designed to accomodate arbitrary drivers as though the absence of security is a feature demanded by the marketplace.

This brings to mind the purportedly-true story of the evolution of the automobile seatbelt. You've probably heard that consumers resented seatbelts initially, and manufacturers didn't want to install them, because they gave the impression that there was danger involved in driving a car. Compared to the seatbeltless horse or bicycle, a car with a seatbelt looked scary, and car manufacturers weren't in the fear business, they sold convenience and other delightful things. I'm not going to take the time to track down a definitive answer to the question of the authenticity of this historical tale, if it isn't true then perhaps it should have been. Rhetoric is always better when it's mostly true. The point is that computing can't continue without seatbelts. We simply cannot let our CPUs continue to execute whatever happens to come along each day. If you've ever tried to assemble a list of the processes normally executed by one of your Windows boxes, so that you might be able to spot a suspicious process that wasn't there before, you've probably realized that a malicious process can come and go faster than the Windows Task Manager will refresh. And Task Manager doesn't bother to keep a record of past program executions, so you'll only spot a suspicious process in this way if it happens to be long-lived or if you audit process execution at just the right time. Putting aside for a moment the obvious need for better low-level hardware-based controls over code execution, is there really any reason for Windows to allow programs to execute without first requiring the end-user or an administrator to authorize them in advance using a simple software control?

If we add even the simplest software seatbelt to the boxes we drive every day, we can turn antivirus software upside down, replacing it instead with anti-software software. Not unlike the anti-driver purpose served by automobile ignition keys, or the anti-death purpose served by seatbelts, we must redesign our infosec safety precautions around the idea that the bad things that can happen are worse than the protections we must have to guard against them. Nobody would accept an out-of-date list of ways in which one can die in an automobile in lieu of a seatbelt, so why do we accept that an out-of-date list of bad code is a viable way to protect ourselves while we drive a computer?

To complete what turned out to be a three-part-series on using hash algorithms for code authentication and containment, below I offer a working prototype of a software seatbelt for Windows. The last two articles in this newsletter laid the foundation for forensic hash sets produced using the MD5 or SHA-1 hash algorithms and comprehensive, full-file hash digests as a replacement for the Microsoft plan to some day make digital signatures work perfectly. Software vendors should communicate hash sets to users, and users should assemble and periodically verify hash sets of code modules installed on Windows boxes. But we also need runtime verification of hashes against our trusted hash sets. That's what the prototype below is designed to accomplish, albeit very crudely. The best way for runtime hash verification to occur is doubtless with the assistance of hardware enhancements to CPU and motherboard architecture. No add-on, after-the-fact technique to inject hash verification (or antivirus scanning, for that matter) into Windows will ever be as good as a simple kernel modification. Still, the code shown below isn't a complete waste of time. I've been using a precursor to this code for a while, without the hash verification feature, and feel that it gives a valuable log of executable modules that are invoked on a box, if nothing else. By adding hash code profiling and verification based on the work shown in the last two newsletter articles this code begins to look more promising. At least as a source of ideas and code.

#define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
#define ALGORITHM CALG_SHA1
//#define ALGORITHM CALG_MD5

#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x0500
#include <stdio.h>
#include <windows.h>
#include <wincrypt.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <malloc.h>

#define BUFSIZE 2048

DWORD hashfile(HCRYPTPROV hcp, char * fname, char ** lphash);
void writehash(HCRYPTPROV hcp,HANDLE hProfile,char *sModulePath,char *sHash,DWORD hashlen);
BOOL validatehash(HANDLE hProfile,char *sHash,DWORD hashlen);
DWORD WINAPI BlockProcThread(LPVOID lpParameter);


HANDLE hBlockProcThread = 0;
UINT uiSP = 0;
UINT ui = 0;
DWORD dwBytes = 0;
char sProfileDirPath[MAX_PATH];
char sProfileModePath[MAX_PATH];
char sProfiledPath[MAX_PATH];
char sBlockedPath[MAX_PATH];
char sSystemPath[MAX_PATH];
char buf[MAX_PATH];
char sModulePath[MAX_PATH];


BOOL APIENTRY DllMain( HANDLE hModule, DWORD ul_reason_for_call, LPVOID lpReserved) { if(ul_reason_for_call == DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH) { uiSP = GetSystemDirectory(sSystemPath,MAX_PATH); // appending 27 characters plus 0 "\AppInitProfile\ProfileMode" if(uiSP > 0 && (uiSP + 28) < MAX_PATH) { if(lstrcpy(sProfileDirPath,sSystemPath) != 0) { if(lstrcat(sProfileDirPath,"\\AppInitProfile\\") != 0) { if(lstrcpy(sProfileModePath,sProfileDirPath) != 0) { if(lstrcat(sProfileModePath,"ProfileMode") != 0) { dwBytes = GetModuleFileName(0,buf,MAX_PATH); if(dwBytes > 0) { lstrcpy(sModulePath,buf); // path may be UNC path "\\?\*" or local path "C:\*" // replace each backslash or colon with underscore for(ui = 0;ui < dwBytes;ui++) { if(buf[ui] == '\\' || buf[ui] == ':') { buf[ui] = '_'; }} if(lstrcpy(sProfiledPath,sProfileDirPath) != 0) { if(dwBytes + lstrlen(sProfiledPath) < MAX_PATH) { if(lstrcat(sProfiledPath,buf) != 0) { // "BLOCKED " = 8 characters plus NULL if(lstrlen(sProfileDirPath) + dwBytes + 9 < MAX_PATH) { if(lstrcpy(sBlockedPath,sProfileDirPath) != 0) { if(lstrcat(sBlockedPath,"BLOCKED ") != 0) { if(lstrcat(sBlockedPath,buf) != 0) { hBlockProcThread = CreateThread(0,0,BlockProcThread,0,0,0); if(hBlockProcThread) { SetThreadPriority(hBlockProcThread,THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL); }}}}}}}}}}}}}}} return TRUE; }

DWORD WINAPI BlockProcThread(LPVOID lpParameter)
{
 BOOL bProfileMode = FALSE;
 BOOL bBlocked = FALSE;
 HANDLE hProfile = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
 HCRYPTPROV hcp = 0;
 BOOL hashfiles = TRUE;
 FILE * f = 0;
 char * sHash = 0;
 DWORD a = 0;
 DWORD dwerr = 0;

if(!CryptAcquireContext(&hcp,0,MS_DEF_PROV,PROV_RSA_FULL,CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT))
{ dwerr = GetLastError();
 hashfiles = FALSE; }
 hProfile = CreateFile(sProfileModePath,GENERIC_READ,
 FILE_SHARE_READ,0,OPEN_EXISTING,0,0);
 if(hProfile != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
 bProfileMode = TRUE;
 CloseHandle(hProfile);
 hProfile = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
}
 hProfile = CreateFile(sBlockedPath,GENERIC_READ,
 FILE_SHARE_READ,0,OPEN_EXISTING,0,0);
 if(hProfile != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{       // no need to hash if BLOCKED previously
 bBlocked = TRUE;
}
 if(!bBlocked)
{
 hProfile = CreateFile(sProfiledPath,GENERIC_READ,
 FILE_SHARE_READ,0,OPEN_EXISTING,0,0);
 if(hProfile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
 if(bProfileMode)
{       // Profile Mode
 hProfile = CreateFile(sProfiledPath,GENERIC_WRITE,
 FILE_SHARE_READ,0,CREATE_NEW,0,0);
}
 else
{       // Protect Mode
 hProfile = CreateFile(sBlockedPath,GENERIC_WRITE,
 FILE_SHARE_READ,0,CREATE_NEW,0,0);
 if(hProfile != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
 bBlocked = TRUE;
}}
 if(hProfile != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE && hashfiles)
{       // first time module is encountered, hash it
 a = hashfile(hcp,sModulePath,&sHash);
 if(a)
{       // write the hash to file, BLOCKED or not
 writehash(hcp,hProfile,sModulePath,sHash,a);
}}}
 else if(!bProfileMode && hashfiles)
{ // when the module has been profiled before, and
 // protect mode is on, validate the authorized hash
 a = hashfile(hcp,sModulePath,&sHash);
 if(a)
{
 if(!validatehash(hProfile,sHash,a))
{
 bBlocked = TRUE;
}}}}
 CloseHandle(hProfile);
 if(hcp != 0) { CryptReleaseContext(hcp,0); }
 if(bBlocked && !bProfileMode)
{
 TerminateProcess(GetCurrentProcess(),0);
}
 return 0;
}

void writehash(HCRYPTPROV hcp,HANDLE hProfile,char *sModulePath,char *sHash,DWORD hashlen)
{
DWORD a = 0;
DWORD bufsize = 0;


 // WriteFile could fail, error handling needed here
 if(!WriteFile(hProfile,sHash,hashlen,&bufsize,0))
{
 a = GetLastError();
}
 free(sHash);
 if(!WriteFile(hProfile," *",2,&bufsize,0))
{
 a = GetLastError();
}
 if(!WriteFile(hProfile,sModulePath,lstrlen(sModulePath),&bufsize,0))
{
 a = GetLastError();
}
 if(!WriteFile(hProfile,"\r\n",2,&bufsize,0))
{
 a = GetLastError();
}}

BOOL validatehash(HANDLE hProfile,char *sHash,DWORD hashlen)
{
 char * buf;
 BOOL b = FALSE;
 DWORD dwread = 0;

 if(!sHash) { return FALSE; }
 buf = malloc(hashlen + 1);
 if(buf) {
 buf[hashlen] = 0;
 // read expected hash from file then compare to sHash
 if(ReadFile(hProfile,buf,hashlen,&dwread,0))
{
 if(dwread == hashlen)
{
 if(!strncmp(sHash,buf,hashlen)) {
 b = TRUE;
}}}
 free(buf);
}
 free(sHash);
 return b;
}

DWORD hashfile(HCRYPTPROV hcp, char * fname, char ** lphash)
{
 HCRYPTHASH hash = 0;
 HANDLE h = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
 DWORD b = 0;
 FILE * f = 0;
 size_t sz = 0;
 DWORD bufsize = 0;
 BYTE buf[BUFSIZE];
 BYTE *pbuf = 0;
 DWORD a = 0;
 char * shash = 0;
 DWORD dwerr = 0;

if(lphash == 0) { return 0; }

 if(!CryptCreateHash(hcp,ALGORITHM,0,0,&hash)) { dwerr = GetLastError();
 return 0; }

 h = CreateFile(fname,GENERIC_READ,
  FILE_SHARE_READ, 0, OPEN_EXISTING, 0, 0);
 if(h != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
        do {
 if(ReadFile(h,buf,BUFSIZE,&bufsize,0)) {
 if(bufsize > 0) {
 CryptHashData(hash,buf,bufsize,0);
}
}
 else {
 CryptDestroyHash(hash);
 hash = 0;
}
}
 while(bufsize > 0);
 if(hash) {
 CryptGetHashParam(hash,HP_HASHVAL,0,&bufsize,0);
 if(bufsize > 0) {
 pbuf = (BYTE *)malloc(bufsize);
 if(pbuf) {
 if(CryptGetHashParam(hash,HP_HASHVAL,pbuf,&bufsize,0)) {
 *lphash = (char *)malloc(bufsize * 2 + 1); // caller will free
 if(*lphash) { shash = *lphash;
 shash[bufsize * 2] = 0;
 b = bufsize * 2;
 for(a=0;a < bufsize;a++) {
 _snprintf(&(shash[a*2]),2,"%02x",pbuf[a]);
}}}}
 free(pbuf);
}}
 CloseHandle(h);
}
 if(hash) { CryptDestroyHash(hash); }
 return b;
}

The code shown here compiles into a DLL. If you prefer to use the MD5 hash algorithm instead of SHA-1 simply adjust the value of the ALGORITHM #define as shown. Installation is done by placing a copy of the binary in the Windows System directory and editing the following Registry value located in the specified HKLM\Software Registry key. Type the name of the DLL without its path when you edit or create the "AppInit_DLLs" Registry value.

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows\AppInit_DLLs

Next, create a folder under the Windows System directory named "AppInitProfile" such as:

c:\winnt\system32\AppInitProfile\

Finally, place an empty text file in the AppInitProfile directory named "ProfileMode". The presence of this file indicates that the code should operate in profile mode rather than protect mode. No process will be terminated while the ProfileMode file is present. Instead, each process that launches and that links either statically or dynamically with user32.dll will generate a corresponding text file in the AppInitProfile directory. The hash code of the executable module responsible for creating the process is stored, with winsha1sum-compatible formatting, for later use. Delete, or rename, the ProfileMode text file to switch to protect mode, where any executable module not previously profiled will be hashed, logged in a text file beginning with the word BLOCKED, and its process will be abruptly terminated. Although there are many limitations to the AppInit_DLLs feature of user32.dll (you can read more about them with a search through the Microsoft Knowledge Base) there is certainly nothing wrong with having a little more control over the code that executes under Windows. And having a record of code that executed in the past, or tried to execute and was blocked, is as basic to information security as any safety feature in a car is to driving, and arriving alive, when you're on the road.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html