Re: [Full-Disclosure] atrticle in: Security Wire Perspectives, Vol. 5, NO. 93, December 19, 2003

[George Capehart <capegeo@opengroup.org>]

On Friday 19 December 2003 12:20 pm, Ron DuFresne wrote:

<snip>

> missed this.  The reason I ask is, there has been a large shift in
> the security "lists/field/top dogs" in trying to avoid casting
> blame/responsibility at M$ for the products it has pushed into the
> market place, perhaps due to the deep pockets and breadth of market
> saturation, thus dependance of many upon the M$ pocketbook to feed
> the rest of the industry in one fashion or another.  The critical 
> articles of a year+ past seem to now, especially after the @stake
> recent actions, to be focused these days upon avoiding mentioning the
> shortcomings from redmond.  Are others reading the same these days?

Yep.
-- 
George Capehart

capegeo at opengroup dot org

PGP Key ID: 0x63F0F642 available on most public key servers

"It is always possible to agglutenate multiple separate problems into a
 single complex interdependent solution.  In most cases this is a bad
 idea."  -- RFC 1925

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html