[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-Disclosure] RE: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1331 - 20 msgs
- To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
- Subject: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1331 - 20 msgs
- From: "Daniel Sichel" <daniels@ponderosatel.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:56:52 -0800
>I agree with your professor. I don't use the CERT site on a daily, or
even weekly basis like I do sans.org, but when I need information from
>it, it's always been relevant, accurate (as far as I can tell) and up
to date. What exactly is supposed to "suck" about the site, I wonder??
>Jeff Stebelton
Just goes to show you that you can't believe everything you hear in
college. The one occaison I bothered to report a hack to CERT it was ten
days before a response. Some emergency response. The information is hard
to digest and, as pointed out, mostly for subscribers. CERT appears to
be a sinecure for the unixoids who man (person?) it. I am not impressed.
Dan Sichel, Network Engineer
Ponderosa Telephone Company
(559) 868-6367
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html