[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Linux (in)security
- To: Bruce Ediger <eballen1@qwest.net>
- Subject: Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Linux (in)security
- From: Stormwalker <bruen@coldrain.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:32:29 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Bruce Ediger wrote:
>...
> Well, no, but I don't believe your theory either. VMS usually gets
> held up as an example of an OS without significant security problems.
> Sorry to tell you, but DEC wrote VMS mainly in VAX-11 assembler.
> The Alpha-CPU port of VMS involved writing a VAX-11 assember compiler,
> and compiling the VAX assembly code to Alpha object code.
Perhaps my memory is too feeble to know for sure, but when I was
running VMS so long ago, much of the source code I read was in
Bliss[16|32], a macro-like language that only DEC used.
cheers, bob
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html