[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: No Subject
- To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: No Subject
- From: Peter Busser <peter@adamantix.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:14:42 +0200
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:41:59PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:20 AM +0200 Michal Zalewski
> <lcamtuf@ghettot.org> wrote:
> >
> >Rant: mainstream Linux is generally not all that enthusiastic about
> >implementing security features (even non-executable stack or using some
> >feeble but standard kernel security capabilities is quite unpopular in
> >major distributions). Adding transcluent buttons to KDE/GNOME seems to be
> >the top priority.
> >
> Am I the only one on the list who immediately thought of Microsoft when
> reading this rant?
> :-)
The big difference here is that you _can_ choose for a distribution that
provides more security if you want. You just have to search a bit and you can
find about a dozen security related Linux and *BSD projects/products.
Groetjes,
Peter Busser
--
The Adamantix Project
Taking trustworthy software out of the labs, and into the real world
http://www.adamantix.org/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html