Re: [Full-Disclosure] No Subject (re: openssh exploit code?)

[Blue Boar <BlueBoar@thievco.com>]

mitch_hurrison@ziplip.com wrote:
> My main point being there is simply no
> need for the disclosure of exploits. 

English is a funny language.  Based on the rest of your note, I assume 
by "no need", you mean that there's no one forcing you to release your 
exploits, and you see no moral imperitive that says you should, yes?  Or 
do you also mean to say that there is "no need" on the part of others, 
by which I mean that you don't believe that other people can put 
exploits to legal, productive uses?

					BB

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html