[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Hacker suspect says his PC was hijacked
- To: Full-Disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Hacker suspect says his PC was hijacked
- From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 08:47:31 -0700
Steve Wray wrote:
Will "Knowingly allowing a computer under your control
to remain in an exploitable state" become a crime?
(if it isn't already...)
It may already be. Certainly it exposes one to civil liability --
if an incident or event was foreseeable, there's certainly
negligence, or the common law doctrine of maintaining an
attractive nuisance. In the case of a computer owned by
a business entity, you might expect (in the US) Sarbanes-Oxley and GLBA
to be relevant -- failure to adhere to a standard of due care,
etc. etc.
Failure to adhere to the consensus best practice may mean you
are implicitly stating that you've agreed to accept the liability
for the result.
--
"Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no
wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred."
- The Mahabharata
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html