[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Weak response from RH
- To: "Gregory A. Gilliss" <ggilliss@netpublishing.com>, <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Weak response from RH
- From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@utdallas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:44:34 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory A. Gilliss [mailto:ggilliss@netpublishing.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:21 AM
> To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Weak response from RH
>
> Security by Condescension! Go Red Hat - maybe M$ can try this
> next: please do not overflow the buffers in our application
> or we will not honor your EULA <G>
>
I wish you hadn't said this. Next thing you know we really *will* find
this in the EULA. :-)
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html